Badr Hari as a Revolutionary
Now this is a great piece of an article which i really suggest for everyone to read, haters of fans, it s all the same. I think Badr Hari is one of the very VERY few sportsmen and - all in all- people, who can create such emotions, and articles. Written by Neil Manich on Headkicklegend.
I like every other writer on this site, have been going on a bit of a Badr Hari binge in preparation of his eminent return on the It's Showtime card in Lyon in nine days. I've rewatched every Badr Hari fight I can get my eyes on, and honestly I struggle to think of a more enjoyable assignment. What's really struck me about Badr Hari's fights isn't just his aggression or power. Those two traits are obvious. Anybody who watches a single second of a Badr fight can see that. What really impressed me and shocked me even was Hari's determination and persistence. His drive to finish the fight not with his physical assets, but by his sheer will and volition.
Badr Hari fights like a revolutionary. No revolutionary, or perhaps even man, ever possessed the extreme voluntaristic drive to change and shape the world they lived in quite like Vladimir Lenin. Lenin ate, drank, and slept a revolution which for the majority of his life looked as though it would never come into fruition, and never would have if it weren't for his tireless effort. He advocated that a revolutionary must be a professional, that every aspect of the revolutionary's life would be focused on the cause. The October Revolution of 1917 wasn't just the culmination of his life's work, it was the culmination of his life. Lenin shaped the world he lived in with his iron will and focus. It's a trait shared by few men in history. Napoleon, Julius Caesar and Alexander. These Hegelian figures reshaped the world with their drive, opting to cut the knot in half instead of untying it.
Badr Hari fights like one of them. It may not have been one of his career's highlights, but Badr's 2010 win over Alexey Ignashov was a perfect example for this. They had met before back in 2003 when Hari was still just an 88 kilogram twinkle in his mafia boss's eye. At that time Ignashov was still the toast of the kickboxing world and the favorite to go on to win the Grand Prix. Hari on the other hand was a late replacement for Melvin Manhoef and completely undersized and under-prepared for competition like Ignashov. Ignashov, for his part, fought like the massive favorite he was; Hari, on the other hand, refused to play the part of overmatched underdog. Ignashov was too much for the skinny Hari. He outpointed him throughout the three rounds and eventually dropped Hari with a body punch. The last image of the fight consisted of Ignashov humiliatingly teaching Hari how to breathe and recover from the blow.
But Hari had absolutely no business even making it that far against Ignashov. The entire fight Badr had that look in his eye, that dead set stare, that made you think he didn't realize that he was supposed to be the underdog. He came at Ignashov with everything he had, even a flying head kick at one point. At the end of the fight the announcer prophetically argued that we should re-watch this fight in five years. It took seven, but he was right.
When Hari and Ignashov met again in 2010, everything had changed. Hari was no longer the skinny upstart that dropped to a shot to the solar plexus; he had blossomed into the single most important fighter in kickboxing. Ignashov had seen his career make an about face as well as his bloated body felt the weight of years of alcoholism and under achieving. The fight was again meant to be a blowout, but in the opposite direction. Ignashov represented the old decaying regime, like an antiquated but once great autocracy that only required a gust of strong wind to send it crashing down in pieces. He was the Russian tsarist system in the twentieth century, the bloated monarchy in France in the eighteenth century. Badr was going to be that strong wind. The look in his eyes guaranteed it.
Ignashov was unable to mount any offense at all, but he proved to be nearly impossible to hit. His head movement paired with his willingness to flat out run away at times kept Badr on the outside. At one point in the third as Hari came crashing in with hooking punches Ignashov simply leaned against the ropes and threw the calmest teep ever which caught the overextended Hari off guard and dropped him on his butt. But Ignashov's elusiveness never even came close to frustrating Hari, nor did it even make him change his strategy. He was unshakable. He worked to put Ignashov in the corner, where he could put a winging glove to Ignashov's face. He did this for three rounds.
Like Lenin, or Napoleon, or Ceasar, or Alexander, Badr Hari will not allow for the universe to tell him no. If he finds himself in a situation that isn't laid out for his benefit, he simply reshapes the world. In the ring Hari has the ability to tell reality what it is going to look like, and more often than not reality listens.
it is a BEAUTIFUL and true descrpition of that very
first important fight of Badr, what a fight and
what fighters!!
and i think this articles really has the point,
Badr , really doesnt matter in this context whether
he is good or bad, is one of the very few gifted
with that aura or strenght of will to reshape the
world around him,. Who else would the world have
excused 2 such DQs, criminal connections all this?
And he is back in the ring, and the crowd
celebrates him again. I m a fan of Badr, because i
was among the very few, who have seen his
incredible potentials, while he was still not a
known sports figure. I just hope the best for him
because he is The talent of kickboxing and i would
really be glad, if this guy who has all the
potentials would not eventually go down on the
toilet. I know he is a natural born self distructor
but has been also strong to stand up so far. So i
hope the best for him.
so, if a few of you have read both articles, please
tell me which is the article which stands closer to
what you believe Badr and his whole phenomenon is
or will be?
Szanpan, thanks for posting the article, but (as
you know) we have a rule here: If you didn't write the article yourself, you should mention the source (and author if possible)
Hi D-rop yes of course i know i have put the link
of both articles in the URL section including the
author. Please let me know if you see it, of course
i can reedit them both if it s not good like that.
@szanpan The URL box is for
videos.If you can't see it in the article, we can't see it either.
Please, re-edit.
I think, especially in editorial articles like this, you should give credit to the real author of the article ...
About the article:I read it a few times, and I can't help but find it ridiculous to make these comparisons ...
The author does not need to use this method to analyze the phenomenon HARI
its just a fantasy story ! the look in his eyes is
just the look of a fighter who want to finish a
fight! he just likes to ko other fighters!
Badr is a bully. He fights like a bully. Going
forward without any thought of defence. His fight
in Lyon proves that dispite a year off he did
nothing to change his style.Comparing a professional athlete to political figures is overstating his/her importance.
Lenin also killed many of his own coutrymen. Badr is unprofessional. He does not respect the other fighters or the sport. This is proven by his past action in and out of the ring. I have said before that pro athletes have th responsibility to be role models.
@Cdn
Mongoose just like mike tyson? now and then you
need a guy like hari! the greatest mohammed ali was
always trashtalking! is that respectfull?? some
hated him some loved him! and thats the same with
badr hari!he still is a role model in a way! now the youngsters all over the world could see that you can loose a lott by missbehaving! and if he now fights like a gentlemen, then he also showed that people can change!
Ok D-rop i reedit the article in a few minute.
Despite the fantastic comparisons the likes of which I have read long ago ( do you remember Rul3z he used to write this way a bit) the article IMO has some points.
1. Badr definitely did not wanted to be the underdog in the first Ignashov fight and it was a great fight indeed
2. I think it s true that when he wants to finish a fight, he wants to finish it on all accounts
3. he has that stare IMO maybe not dead stare but something similar.
Interesting that noone of you write about the actual fights. I think the description of the fights is good over here. It was fun for me to read it anyhow :)
@ronaldo good talk! I agreee.And yes Badr Hari is a revolutionary in the way, that before this, there was noone ever ever in kickboxing sport to whom so much had been excused. I dont remember a fighter who was soch controversial as Hari and also i havent read more articles on a standup fighter than him. I hope to see some great fights from him in the future. I dont think people can change but i hope he will try at least for a while,
it s interesting that everyone commented on this
article, although i think there are more things to
think about in the previous one.. but thats ok, and
thank you for all your comments.

